Let IR denote the set of all real numbers. Define the function f: IR → R by f(x)=\ [[2 - 2x ^ 2 - x ^ 2 * sin(1/x)], [2]] if x≠0, x = 0 Then which one of the following statements is TRUE? A The function f is NOT differentiable at x = 0 B There is a positive real number 8, such that f is a decreasing function on the interval (0, δ) For any positive real number 8, the function f is NOT an increasing function on the interval (-8, 0) x = 0 is a point of local minima of f
Detailed Explanation
1. Setting up the function
For we can write
Since is always between and , the bracket is always between and (i.e. always positive).
2. Checking differentiability at
Recall the definition of the derivative at :
Here
Because , the whole expression is squeezed between and , which tends to as . Hence
So is differentiable at ; option A is wrong.
3. Derivative for
For differentiate term by term:
Close to , the two terms containing vanish (they are ), so the sign of is essentially the sign of , which oscillates between and infinitely often when approaches .
4. Consequences of the oscillating sign
- Because keeps changing sign, no matter how tiny an interval you choose, will sometimes be positive and sometimes negative inside it. Hence we can never get purely decreasing behaviour on . So option B is false.
- The same oscillation happens on the left: in every the derivative changes sign, so cannot be purely increasing there. Thus option C is true.
5. Local maximum or minimum at 0?
Remember we rewrote
Since the bracket is always positive, gives
Therefore all nearby points lie below the point , making a point of local maximum, not minimum. Option D is false.
Hence,
Simple Explanation (ELI5)
What is the question?
You have a hill‐shaped curve drawn by the rule
You must pick which sentence about this curve is right.
How do we judge the sentences?
- Smoothness at 0 (differentiable or not) – check if the slope exists.
- Always going down just to the right of 0 – see if the slope stays negative.
- Always going up just to the left of 0 – see if the slope stays positive (we’ll test the opposite).
- Is 0 the lowest point nearby? – compare the height at 0 with the heights of nearby points.
By using only the ideas of slopes (derivatives), sign of slope, and comparing heights, we can decide which line is true.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step-by-step solution
-
Derivative at 0
So exists option A is false.
-
Derivative for
Near , the dominant term is which oscillates between and . Hence changes sign infinitely often in every neighbourhood of .
- Cannot be strictly decreasing on option B false.
- Cannot be strictly increasing on for any option C true.
-
Local extrema at 0
Hence is a local maximum, not a minimum option D false.
Therefore, the correct statement is option C.
Examples
Example 1
Small-angle pendulum motion uses sin(theta)≈theta, showing how oscillations damp out with a small scaling parameter – similar to our tiny x multiplying an oscillatory term.
Example 2
Radio signals often combine a slow trend (carrier) with a fast oscillation (modulation); removing the slow trend is much like stripping the -4x and -2x sin(1/x) terms to see the raw cosine oscillation.
Example 3
Economic data series can have a long-term quadratic trend with short-term cyclic variation; analysing monotonicity requires understanding where the cyclic part overrides the trend – exactly what we did with cos(1/x).