**15.** Let \( f(x) = 7\tan^8 x + 7\tan^6 x - 3\tan^4 x - 3\tan^2 x \), \( I_1 = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{4}} f(x) \, dx \) and \( I_2 = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{4}} x f(x) \, dx \). Then \( 7I_1 + 12I_2 \) is equal to: - (1) \( 2\pi \) - (2) \( \pi \) - (3) 1 - (4) 2
Detailed Explanation
1. Understanding the integrand
The given function
contains only even powers of . Setting (so ) is therefore a natural substitution, because it converts powers of into plain powers of and replaces the mysterious by .
2. Converting I1
With , the limits change from to and from to .
Long-division by is the crucial trick:
That turns I1 into a plain polynomial integral—quick to evaluate.
3. Converting I2
For
exactly the same substitution gives
The new obstacle is the . The classic remedy is integration by parts:
- pick (simple derivative) and (easy antiderivative),
- then and . Because the term drops out neatly at both limits, the remaining integral once again reduces to a polynomial.
4. Final combination
After the two clean evaluations, you form the linear combination : I1 turns out to be 0, I2 a tiny fraction, so the mix simplifies to the integer 1.
The whole exercise reinforces three key JEE-level skills:
- Spotting symmetry/cancellation in rational functions of .
- Executing a t = tan x substitution confidently.
- Knowing when and how to invoke integration by parts to tame an extra factor of (or ).
Simple Explanation (ELI5)
What’s going on here?
Imagine you have a strange roller-coaster track whose height at every point is given by a messy formula full of ’s.
You first want to know how much total ‘area’ (call it I1) is under that track from the starting gate () up to the point (that’s 45°).
Then you want a slightly different thing, I2, where you multiply each little strip of area by its x-coordinate before adding it up (so strips farther away count a bit more).
Finally, your teacher mixes those two answers in the recipe 7 I1 + 12 I2 and asks: what number pops out?
How can we attack it?
- Swap the angle for its slope: The roller-coaster’s steepness is . Replacing with turns all those powers of into simple powers of .
- Notice a magic cancellation: After the swap, the horrible fraction actually collapses to a much simpler polynomial. That makes I1 super easy (it becomes 0!).
- Use a clever handshake (integration by parts): For I2, the swap gives you an extra . A standard trick called “integration by parts” cleverly moves that out of the way.
- Add, stir, and taste: Crunch the numbers; everything simplifies to the neat little number 1. That is exactly option (3).
So the roller-coaster question secretly hides a very neat cancellation and only wants you to know a couple of standard calculus tools!
Step-by-Step Solution
Step-by-step calculation
1. Evaluate
Substitute , so and limits become .
Long-divide by :
Hence
2. Evaluate
With the same substitution,
Take
,
.
Integration by parts:
The boundary term vanishes because at both and .
Divide once more:
Therefore
3. Combine as required
[ \boxed{1}\quad\text{(option 3)} ]
Examples
Example 1
Finding the centroid (center of mass) of a uniform rod by integrating x · density — a real-life use of an ∫x f(x) form.
Example 2
Calculating the average value of a signal over a time interval, which also involves integrals that multiply by x or t.
Example 3
Optics: using ∫θ · f(θ) when determining the average angular deviation in a scattering experiment.
Example 4
Probability: the expected value E[X] = ∫x p(x) dx parallels I2, where p(x) acts like f(x).